You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Key characteristics of the investigated dispensers and handrub volume-loss in 8 h, relative to the baseline volume (N = 22)

From: Critical Reliability Issues of Common Type Alcohol-Based Handrub Dispensers

Code nameDosingPumping mechanismConditionVolume loss in 8 h
Dispenser #AManualRegularNew99%
Dispenser #BManualRegularNew96%
Dispenser #CManualRegularNew92%
Dispenser #DManualRegularNew70%
Dispenser #EManualRegularUsed52%
Dispenser #FManualRegularUsed32%
Dispenser #GManualRegularNew32%
Dispenser #HManualRegularNew24%
Dispenser #IManualRegularNew20%
Dispenser #JManualRegularNew20%
Dispenser #KManualRegularNew19%
Dispenser #LManualRegularNew7%
Dispenser #MAutomaticGravitationalNew5%
Dispenser #NAutomaticGravitationalNew5%
Dispenser #OManualRegularUsed3%
Dispenser #PManualRegularNew1%
Dispenser #QManualGravitationalNew1%
Dispenser #RManualRegularNew1%
Dispenser #SAutomaticGravitationalUsed0%
Dispenser #TAutomaticGravitationalNew0%
Dispenser #UManualRegularNew-1%
Dispenser #VManualRegularUsed-1%
  1. Footnote to the Table: Volume loss (average of 5 measures) at 8 h are indicated as percentages. Negative percentages indicate that the dispenser actually distributed more handrub than measured at baseline; such 1% difference can be explained by the variability induced by the method